Ida L Lupton vs Silas Lupton ~ 1895
Transcribed by Joan S Dunn
Source: Nc Reports
Written: 1895
Ida L. Lupton v. Silas Lupton
September Term, 1895
Description - Parol Evidence to Assist Description - Identification
Where the assignment to a widow of her year's support from her husband's
estate included "one-half of boat," and it was proved in an action relating to
the title thereto that her husband was interested in but one boat; Held, that
such assignment was not void, and parole evidence was admissible to identify
the boat as the one in which the husband had a half interest.
Special Proceeding, begun before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Carteret
County, for the sale for partition of a boat, described in the petition. One
issue, as to title, was raised, and being transferred to Term for trial, was
heard before Boykin, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1894, of Carteret Superior
Court. These facts sufficiently appear in the decision of Chief Justice
Faircloth. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appealed.
Messrs. Simmons, Gibbs & Pearsall, for plaintiff
Mr. N. J. Rouse, for defendant (appellant)
[NC Supreme Court]
Faircloth, C. J.: The plaintiff, Ida L. Lupton, filed a petition for sale and
division of the proceeds of a certain boat, "Dolly," alleging that she and
defendant were tenants in common of the boat, which was denied by defendant.
In the assignment of plaintiff's year's allowance from her former husband's
estate, one of the items was "one-half of boat," and defendant insisted that
that part of the assignment was void for want of better description and that
no title passed. It was proved that the boat "Dolly" was the only boat in
which her husband had any interest at his death. His Honor admitted the
assignment in evidence and heard oral testimony as to the identity of the
boat, and defendant excepted and appealed.
The evidence was competent. Spivey v. Grant, 96 NC, 214; Phillips v. Hooker,
Phil. Eq., 194. These cases are distinguishable from Blakely v. Patrick, 67
NC, 40, where there were more than ten buggies, and the ten could not be
identified.
No error and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Back to Miscellaneous Records
Back to Carteret County Page